這里，老師說benchmark agnostic manager是不知道有沒有benchmark的基金經(jīng)理，但又說可以永active risk來衡量。都不一定有benchmark，咋來的
為什么和long-only比, shorting 會(huì)增加 active risk? 謝謝
請(qǐng)問growth cap 都是90% 不就是沒變化嗎？謝謝
請(qǐng)問為什么sector deviation ≤8% from the benchmark 不是absolute risk? 謝謝
這里return based可不可以說weight從63% 降到了85+5=90%，就是算總的large cap
請(qǐng)問這段話什么意思？謝謝
long extension portfolio
請(qǐng)問為什么不能都o(jì)utperform？謝謝
請(qǐng)問objective function 有implicit 的嗎？謝謝
請(qǐng)問這句話怎么理解？謝謝 為什么不是increase security concentration
請(qǐng)問這句話怎么理解？謝謝
請(qǐng)問這句話怎么理解？謝謝
老師你好，請(qǐng)教這句話怎么理解？我不理解:-( Although lower PEG ratios are preferred and BRW has a slightly lower PEG ratio than CSY, BRW’s EPS growth forecast of 12.00% is below the sector long-term growth forecast of 14.00% whereas CSY’s EPS growth forecast of 11.25% is above the sector long-term growth forecast of 10.00%. Given CSY’s combination of above-average growth and a reasonable valuation multiple, it would be the best addition to Fund D.
XTZZ applies its analysis in a manner in which the originally reported data exist as a lagged factor until the revised data become available. This approach differentiates XTZZ from funds that use only the “clean” data, which ignore the initially reported data values. 我的理解這里是說XTZZ 先用initially reported data， 當(dāng)revised data出來之后再用revised 替換。但是答案的解釋又是相反的，請(qǐng)問怎么理解。謝謝
請(qǐng)問這句話什么意思謝謝
程寶問答
金程問答